Google
Web i-site.ph


THE MAY 2004 ELECTIONS: ASSESSMENTS | NAMFREL

Did the SMS System of Reporting Work?

NAMFREL originally intended to use an SMS system for reporting backed up by e-mail and internet-based transmission. However, the SMS system did not turn out to be as effective as we had expected or hoped. The issue was not one of technology or design (although admittedly, a less stringent design might have been more effective). Rather, it was primarily because the master list of precincts that we received from the Comelec Central Office turned out to be inconsistent with the master lists that our chapter chairmen received from Comelec's local offices.

The basic control number of our database was the Precinct No., which was likewise the most critical component of the SMS and Internet systems that we designed. Precincts were supposed to be pre-assigned to volunteers.

Thus, when a volunteer reports the results from a precinct, the system is able to check if the Precinct No. being reported is in fact valid. This is one of the checks that the system does to prevent fake volunteers or "ghost" precincts from being reported to us. Unfortunately, even a valid precinct result, if reported using a number that is non-existent in our database, will also be rejected by the system. For example:

Comelec National clustered Precincts 122A and 123A and assigned a new Precinct No. 86.

Comelec Local, on the other hand, clustered Precincts 122A and 123A and assigned a new Precinct No. 122A-123A.

What is stored in our database is 86, because that's what we picked up from Comelec Central's master list of precinct numbers. But we didn't have 122A-123A. So if 112A-123A was reported to us, that would be considered invalid Precinct No. and the sender would receive the message, "Precinct 122A-123A does not exist" or "You are not allowed to submit for Precinct 122A-123A."

This was only one of several system functions that used and depended on precinct numbers. Imagine therefore several thousand texters sending precinct reports to the system almost at the same time and being responded to with the above message. Many of those reports would be held, pending resolution, instead of moving on to be tabulated.

This accounted for 80 percent of the perceived delay. The rest was accounted for by normal and expected challenges when an organization — especially 200,000-300,000 strong — adopts a new and exciting technology.

We still have high hopes for the possibilities of this type of technology. If it is to be used in the future, however, a much longer timeframe should be allotted for volunteer training. While Filipinos are indeed adept with "texting," training and practice are mandatory for "formatted" texting.

The Elections Results

Total number of precincts reported
179, 564
Percentage of precincts reported
82.98%
 
For President
Macapagal-Arroyo, Gloria
10,400,401
 
For Vice President
De Castro, Noli
12,407,792
 
For Senator
Roxas, Mar
15,600,830
Revilla, Bong
12,768,697
Pimentel, Aquilino
10,765,934
Madrigal, Jamby
10,686,544
Gordon, Richard
10,155,236
Defensor-Santiago, Miriam
9,854,631
Cayetano, Pia
9,682,950
Lapid, Manuel
9,011,789
Lim, Alfredo
9,006,419
Enrile, Juan Ponce
8,827,554
Estrada, Jinggoy
8,826,119
Barbers, Robert
8,466,116

While we have originally listed Senator Rodolfo Biazon as being the No. 12 slot ahead of fellow Senator Robert Barbers in Report 82 on June 5 (at 79.2 percent of precincts reported), subsequent reports submitted during the audit and terminal report preparation period subsequently indicated that Senator Barbers had overtaken Senator Biazon for No. 12 in our Terminal Report (with 82.98 percent of precincts covered).

READ ON


More Assessments


Previously in Focus

Southeast Asia’s Uneven Information Landscape

 
 


Copyright © 2004 All rights reserved.
PHILIPPINE CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM